I'm playing with a graphical signature. . . I'm not yet quite happy with it, but I figured I'd throw it out there for now. . .
What'dya think?
What'dya think?
Unknown_K said:I am sure the dialup users will appreciate how long the pages take to load with those images.
alexkerhead said:Atari, he purposely uses that font with the ragged edges, to emulate the look of old terminal displays.
But yes, a PNG format would help with diffusion, but he needs to use jpg for maximum web browser compatibility.
That looks nice.Erik said:Dialup users? What are those?? :D
I did optimize them down to pretty small sizes, actually. They shouldn't be that slow.
What do y'all think? Is that an issue?
carlsson said:I never quite understood the value in a graphic signature. Text and links, yes.
carlsson said:On another forum I visit, with a much younger member group (several around 13-15, few above 30, extremely rare above 40), a lot of people have several graphic illustrations in their signatures, and it makes the page very long.
Erik said:I'm playing with a graphical signature. . . I'm not yet quite happy with it, but I figured I'd throw it out there for now. . .
What'dya think?
80sFreak said:I like it! (It has a PET 2001!) But I think it needs to be clickable...