Anonymous Coward
Veteran Member
What about emulating 320x200 EGA?
I'm not only talking about color bleed, Seriously, with one combination of colors, some of the left parts of the picture went out of the screen and the remaining was compleetely mis-colored and bleeding as much as I never has seen before! However, there was no zig-zaging when that screen was showed.
What about emulating 320x200 EGA?
I'm not only talking about color bleed, Seriously, with one combination of colors, some of the left parts of the picture went out of the screen and the remaining was compleetely mis-colored and bleeding as much as I never has seen before! However, there was no zig-zaging when that screen was showed.
That sounds very much like the problem I had with my LCD TV. The picture was all over the place and the colours would vary considerably depending on their position on the screen.
I switched the TV out of widescreen mode and it looked a lot better. I keep meaning to make up a CGA->Scart cable to see if that makes things better too.
That sounds very much like the problem I had with my LCD TV. The picture was all over the place and the colours would vary considerably depending on their position on the screen
Is this somehow a different composite signal, why should an old tube TV work better, i just do not get it.
Sw 1/1 ON = Monochrome monitor
Sw 1/1 OFF = RGBI or Composite monitor
Sw 1/2 ON = CGA/Plantonics Color+ graphics mode
Sw 1/2 OFF = MDA/Hercules graphics mode
Sw 1/3 ON = Composite in Color
Sw 1/3 OFF = Composite in Monochrome (IBM PC portable)
Sw 1/4 = Nothing (used on the very few 'g' versions of the card with a joystic port instead of the composite out)
Also, this card produces an extermely ugly text font while in 320x200 or 640x200 CGA graphics mode on a CGA or composite monitor. Is there any way to switch it back to the standard IBM CGA font, perhaps by using one of the undocumented jumpers? The text mode font is the regular IBM CGA "thick" font; it's just the graphics mode font that looks like it came off of a Star Wars title screen.
The font in CGA graphics modes comes from your computer's BIOS, not the graphics card. I suppose in theory you could load a TSR to change it -- has anyone seen such a beast?
I think you got SW1/1 and SW1/2 reversed. I have an ATI Small Wonder in my Packard Bell Turbo-XT. It claims to be "Version 2" but the board layout looks almost identical to Version 1 (except the onboard RCA jack for composite video output is not included), and totally different from the "Version 2" layout shown on stason.org.
GRAPHICS.COM (included with most versions of DOS) is such a program, but it contains only the later half of the character set. The first half is stored within the BIOS, and can in fact not be changed unless you totally replace the entire INT 10h BIOS graphics routine with a TSR. The graphics routine in the TSR must also include the original IBM font for this to work.
That was rather my point; I've only seen programs (like GRAPHICS.COM) doing the second half of the character set. I think a possible approach when writing the TSR would be to set the INT 1F vector depending on whether the character was in the first or second half of the set, then OR the character with 80h and hand off to the original BIOS.
Here is how the normal CGA modes show up on my Packard Bell PB 500 with the ATI card and a Tandy CM-11 monitor:The font in CGA graphics modes comes from your computer's BIOS, not the graphics card. I suppose in theory you could load a TSR to change it -- has anyone seen such a beast?
And here's my elaborate version, supporting loading fonts from files and unloading the TSR on request. It comes preloaded with the font from FreeGEM rather than the IBM ROM BIOS, because that was what I happened to have to hand (and I think it's a nicer font )