Chuck(G)
25k Member
The crazy thing is that the x64 system in question is a recent quad-core Asrock AM3+ board. Not obsolete by any means. I've tried it on a couple of other 64-bit mobos with the same results.
No.Do you have the EISA configuration utilities?
That's my impression, too.ISTR that these beasts had a bunch of IBM-sourced firmware.
I may have an MS-DOS 5.00 disk somewhere, but that may require some digging, and I don't think the floppy drive in this thing works. I also may have a copy of Windows NT Server on CD, but that may be even more digging..What happens if you cut back to a single SCSI drive and try to boot MS-DOS, or NT 3.51 Server?
I took advantage of a free WiFi location and downloaded NetBSD 5.1.3.
It installed and booted flawlessly.
Now I just have to think of a use for this thing.
I can find legitimate uses for a PET 2001, but not something with two to four processors and two ultra wide SCSI buses. Ten years ago it would have made a nice file server and Screamernet node. Today, I can't justify turning it on just to do that.
How about a space heater? It can't be that warm in Wisconsin.
-5ºF! If only we had more snow.
It's almost a sincere winter. Sure beats the wishy-washy weather we've had for the most part the past twelve months.
My terminal settings are correct. I cannot make a VT-220 compliant terminal set as a VT-220 terminal work either. For some reason, Links overrides the terminal settings, and I have no idea what type of terminal it is expecting. Nor will any of the terminal emulations I can use on my serial terminal work.
It stinks, because Links works well, and frankly, this forum is more fun to use in text mode.
I wonder if there are any other text browsers I can use. I don't think Lynx will work. Of course, I wouldn't really know; I haven't tried using it in a very, very long time.
Have you tried running Links inside GNU Screen? Some applications like the emulation layer that Screen provides, and you'd also gain virtual terminal support on your hardware terminal (any terminal session, really).