You are correct and I'm a subject of my own feeble research methods and apologize to all. What I meant to indicated was that W2K was an extension of NT and therefore not completely new technology.
So was NT 4. Ran it for years on a server and desktop at work, as well as my government issued laptop. What hasten the departure from NT to XP was no or very limited USB support. The only USB device I ever encountered on NT4 was for a mouse from some hardware vendor .
Yes, but you're comparing a DOS based OS to a ground up Windows system. W7 is exceptionally stable and that's why I preserved and upgraded my W7 gamer to run with a Ryzen CPU. My W7 gamer can run CyberPunk 77 very nicely. Note: For the nit pickers, the GOG version of CP77 was backported to DX11...
Windows 2000 was merely a NT 4 upgrade with a kernel based on MSDOS and earlier Windows iterations. It was initially going to be released as NT 5. No one is questioning its stability with but its future usefulness, as being DOS based, ensured its downfall. XP was/is a resounding worldwide...
Hi Hunter, how goes it? Don't know about the Kool-Aid, but the Captain & Coke here on the sand at Ft. Meyers Beach is pretty good. Thanks for asking.
Little more about W11. Right before I left home on vacation, my 14 month old Asus gamer took a dump, just out of warranty, I suspect it's the...
Not to be disparaging, but you have no proper insight as to what you speak. In my experience, and when properly installed, it is nearly equal in performance with W7, at least in the gaming arena. Take some time to learn how to setup and use W11 properly. I can speak with some authority as I have...
It seems fashionable here to bash W11. W11 is a modern OS and is designed to be used on modern equipment. When you attempt run W11 on one of your old dogs, it like bolting a 6-speed auto trans out of a Corvette to a Model A with a 4 cylinder flat head.