• Please review our updated Terms and Rules here

5150 with Hercules - Text but no graphics

I use this Gotek. However, I replaced the firmware with FlashFloppy. At least with FlashFloppy, it doesn't matter if the Gotek is 1.44M provided that the images are 720k or smaller. I've also put mine into an old external hard drive enclosure and connected it to the 5150 via the 37-pin dsub connector that comes out the back of the machine using the technique described here. I like keeping the Gotek external because it allows me to keep both of my full height floppy drives in the machine.
2019-07-12-7.jpg2019-07-12-5.jpg2019-07-12-1.jpg2019-07-12-2.jpg
 
Last edited:
I plan to upgrade my setup, at some point, with an external enclosure that contains the both Gotek and a 3.5" 720k floppy drive(I'm pretty sure a 1.44M drive will also work provided the disks are formatted at 720k). This should be possible because the IBM floppy controller supports 2 internal and 2 external floppy drives. I'd then be able to use 3.5" disks and a USB floppy drive or a USB drive to directly transfer files on/off the machine using the original floppy controller(which makes me happy).
 
Last edited:
I've also put mine into an old external hard drive enclosure and connected it to the 5150 via the 37-pin dsub connector that comes out the back of the machine using the technique described here.

Glad to hear this works. I have the 37-pin connectors on order, and have an old FH floppy enclosure with 2 3.5" floppy drives in it. I don't want to take the 5.25" drives out of the 5150, either.
 
Glad to hear this works. I have the 37-pin connectors on order, and have an old FH floppy enclosure with 2 3.5" floppy drives in it. I don't want to take the 5.25" drives out of the 5150, either.

Additionally, if you want to keep your ribbon cable fully within the enclosure, you can use a 37-pin M/F strait through dsub cable to connect the 5150 to the floppy cable. I've tested this and it works even with a 30" ribbon connected to a 3ft cable. My plan is to put one end of the 37-pin connector inside the external enclosure.
2019-07-22-6.jpg2019-07-22-4.jpg2019-08-07.jpg
 
I may go a different route. I just installed a XTIDE board with a CF card. I may pull the 1/2 height Seagate HD and put the two 3.5" drives inside. If I do that, will the 5150 PS be strong enough to handle two Panasonic 360K drives and two 3.5" drives, in addition to the CGA, SixPackPlus, and floppy board?
 
I may go a different route. I just installed a XTIDE board with a CF card. I may pull the 1/2 height Seagate HD and put the two 3.5" drives inside. If I do that, will the 5150 PS be strong enough to handle two Panasonic 360K drives and two 3.5" drives, in addition to the CGA, SixPackPlus, and floppy board?

It depends on the size of your power supply. The early 5150's have a 63w power supply but mine is a later model and it has a 150w(I'm still not sure if it is original or not). However, if it was able to power an MFM drive(which you are removing) then I'm guessing you'll be fine.
 
I may go a different route. I just installed a XTIDE board with a CF card. I may pull the 1/2 height Seagate HD and put the two 3.5" drives inside. If I do that, will the 5150 PS be strong enough to handle two Panasonic 360K drives and two 3.5" drives, in addition to the CGA, SixPackPlus, and floppy board?

Depends on the condition of your PSU, A good 63w 5150 PSU should not have a problem.

...The early 5150's have a 63w power supply but mine is a later model and it has a 150w(I'm still not sure if it is original or not)..

Originally 5150's were not designed to have a hard drive and had 63w PSU's, My late model 5150 has it's original 63w PSU, It was a common upgrade back in the day to fit a more powerful PSU to cope with power hungry hard drives when fitted in the 5150.
 
Depends on the condition of your PSU, A good 63w 5150 PSU should not have a problem.

Originally 5150's were not designed to have a hard drive and had 63w PSU's, My late model 5150 has it's original 63w PSU, It was a common upgrade back in the day to fit a more powerful PSU to cope with power hungry hard drives when fitted in the 5150.

It's the 63W supply. I'm looking for a higher-powered replacement, but they seem to be rare. The hard drive is a Seagate ST238R HH, so it had a low power drain. The FH IBM hard drive I have needs 4A on 12V to start up, which is beyond the IBM 63W PS capabilities. The 3.5" drives only use 5V, so I'll have to check their pull. Only the 5.25" floppies use +12 after I disconnected the hard drive (I think).
 
The 5160 130w and 5162 150w PSU's would fit the 5150, Or another alternative is a transplant job, Find an AT or ATX PSU with the right size innards and transplant the innards into the old 5150 PSU case.
 
Hey, guys. Having a new issue related to the same 5150 unit. After playing a game for a little while, the video gives up and goes dark. The PSU it still running, but no video. I came back a week later with the intent on diagnosing the issue, and it worked just fine. Of course, hardware issues don't heal themselves and after game playing for about 20 minutes the video shut down again. Remember this unit has the Hercules graphics card. First time, I was playing a CGA game using SIMCGA. The second time, it was a game with native Hercules support.

My guesses are (in order of probability):
  1. The PSU
  2. Typical tantalum issues on the mobo.
  3. Capacitors on the Hercules card (it has electrolytics, not regular tantalums)

Reason I suspect tantalums or PSU is the appearance of other random errors. At one point prior to this, it threw a 1081 201 RAM POST error. But only one time. Next power on, POSTed without the RAM error. Since the video went dark the first time, it has begun reporting 131 error on POST (cassette port voltage according -0degrees).

So I'm thinking something is operating on its hairy edge, and the load associated with gaming eventually overwhelms it. The electrolytic capacitors on the Hercules look fine (no bulging or evidence of leaking), but that doesn't necessarily mean they're good.

Configuration:
  • IBM 5150 Series A 16/64k mobo
  • 2nd BIOS revision (10/27/82)
  • Hercules Graphics card (see pic at beginning of thread)
  • IBM 5151 Monochrome CRT


Any thoughts?
 
Any thoughts?

Of course, the symptoms may be totally unrelated.


Nil video symptom

Could even be the monitor. Try another monitor.

Does the symptom appear using a different video card.

Symptom onset perhaps related to temperature.

Does the symptom eventually appear if you don't play a game ? If that is a case, a useful experiment would be to leave the machine sitting at the DOS prompt. When the video disappears, enter the following on the keyboard, the result expecting to be a beep from the speaker. If a beep is heard, the symptom is truly video-only related.

echo ^G >con

(The ^G portion created by holding down the CTRL key, then momentarily pressing the G key.)


201 RAM error

Only having occurred once, it may have been a hiccup.


131 error

Failure of the cassette port loopback test. minuszerodegrees.net indicates multiple possible causes. You have the 16KB-64KB type motherboard. If there was a lack of -5V getting to that motherboard type, the motherboard's RAM chips (4116 class) would not work, resulting in what appears to be a 'dead' motherboard. At power-on, does the 131 error always occur, or is it intermittent ?
 
It might be the cap's on the video card.

Anyway, from your photo it shows the oldest type PS. You may have a 1st batch system. Could you post the serial number or photo of the back of your case. If it mostly original it would be nice to keep it in that condition.

Enjoy that system,
framer
 
Many thanks for all of the suggestions.

You may have a 1st batch system. Could you post the serial number or photo of the back of your case.
Definitely a Series A. Here's the serial number. First gen, but not super early specimen I think. Agree that I want to preserve its authenticity.

IBM 5150 SN.jpg

I do have another Series B 5150 with MDA card along with 5151 and 5153 in storage. Plan to try swapping out cards and monitors, but wanted to see if someone recognized the issue before I start digging out equipment. I like the beep test, though. Will try that next time it fails.

The 131 error happened the last 2-3 POSTs, so not a single occurrence. Will look closer at -0degrees possibilities.

(The ^G portion created by holding down the CTRL key, then momentarily pressing the G key.)
Nice follow-through on how to execute a ctrl-G on the keyboard, btw. :p You no doubt worked phone support at some point in your life.
 
Last edited:
Followup question, unrelated to the 5150 issue...why do my attachments frequently turn upside down when I upload them? I've tried several things, including controlling the aspect ratio in case the uploader is trying to be too smart. I even rotated this image to actually be upside down and then re-uploaded it. No joy.

Is there a trick to keeping images from loading upside down?
 
Is there a trick to keeping images from loading upside down?
Some phones do not rotate the image content, but set a "this image needs to be rotated"-flag in the JPEG file. Other phones rotate the image and set a "this image has been rotated"-flag in the JPEG file. There are different ways to flag images as well. Some image viewers (e.g. web forums) and editing programs simply ignore these flags, others honor them. To make matters worse, these flags may depend on phone vendor, app used to take pictures as well as the app's settings, and viewers don't necessarily understand all of them.

Either find a program which can handle and remove these metadata (many programs don't deal with it correctly), or export the image to BMP (or some other less smart format, e.g. PNM) and re-encode again.
 
I have a tweener running Windows 7 Pro/DOS 6.22 dual boot, ...
Maybe off topic but I really want to know: what did you do to achieve this? A bit info: I wanted to create some W98/W7 systems in the past but after W7 had finished installing, the W98 part had gone. W98/XP went fine. Next step was X98/XP/W7 but every time somehow the W7 part got corrupted and simply stopped working.
I must admit that I never tried to install W7 on a system with DOS 6.22 as its first OS.

Sorry for reacting a bit late but this thread appeared during my internet-less holidays. After returning home I discarded the oldest threads.
 
Maybe off topic but I really want to know: what did you do to achieve this? A bit info: I wanted to create some W98/W7 systems in the past but after W7 had finished installing, the W98 part had gone. W98/XP went fine. Next step was X98/XP/W7 but every time somehow the W7 part got corrupted and simply stopped working.
I must admit that I never tried to install W7 on a system with DOS 6.22 as its first OS.

Sorry for reacting a bit late but this thread appeared during my internet-less holidays. After returning home I discarded the oldest threads.

Win7 won't install normally with DOS in a dual boot. I created a FAT partition, installed DOS. Then installed Win 7 in unallocated space. I used EasyBCD to get them to play nice together.

https://neosmart.net/EasyBCD/
 
Back
Top