I will make detailed photos from the RAM boards when I am back in the office during the next days and post them ...Perhaps a photo of the back will make clear where any replacements took place?
| VCF Latam | Apr 24 - 26, 2026, | Bahía Blanca, Argentina |
| VCF Pac. NW | May 02 - 03, 2026, | Tukwila, WA |
| VCF Southwest | May 29 - 31, 2026, | Westin Dallas Fort Worth Airport |
| VCF Southeast | Aug 01 - 02, 2026, | Atlanta, GA |
| VCF West | Aug 01 - 02, 2026, | Mountain View, CA |
| VCF Midwest | Sep 12 - 13, 2026, | Schaumburg Convention Center, IL |
| VCF Montreal V2.0 | Nov 07 - 08, 2026, | Saint-Lambert, Montreal, Canada |
| VCF SoCal | See you in 2027, | Southern CA |
| VCF East | Apr TBD, 2027, | InfoAge, Wall, NJ |
I will make detailed photos from the RAM boards when I am back in the office during the next days and post them ...Perhaps a photo of the back will make clear where any replacements took place?
If you'd do the same for the six CPU boards that would be appreciated as well.I will make detailed photos from the RAM boards when I am back in the office during the next days and post them ...
The 11/60 Cabinet and Power Supply manual has a lot of detail on how the H7850 works. That should be enough to debug them.BTW, if someone has the schematics from the H7850 regulator, it would help us a lot because as expected this part still needs more investigations ...
From the rear side you can see the rework. Since the replaced parts also have DEC P/Ns on them, I'm guessing this was depot-level repair long enough ago that the chips were expensive enough that it made sense to do that level of rework.Thank you for the photos. So that mostly-Motorola module is an -ED after all. With three dozen Mostek replacements, done quite well as far as I can see from here. Only the 7th row, fourth from the right (as seen from the component side) looks like there is perhaps some flux residue on the solder side. Maybe manufacturing ran short of Motorola components that day and just stuffed randomly with on-hand Mostek?
+1 on the fish paper. A thin rugged plastic sheet is another possibility but my money is on the fish paper. Now if we could just keep those rubbed-down ceramic disk capacitors intact. At least they don't go "boom!", or leak.BTW, watch out for those electrolytics (particularly the ones in the middle of the board) - they get ripped up by the board in front of them and can short to the adjacent board. DEC often used fish paper on the backs of memory boards, but even that didn't help the first board as it was up against the CPU. I've used this in the past.
I can't, but I'll take your word for it :-}. So that's what a depot-level repair looks like. Sure was extensive, but mighty clean. What's your hypothesis for having three dozen chip failures? Perhaps all turned out to be marginal WRT timing requirements? How would they have gone about detecting and localizing each of them, then?From the rear side you can see the rework. Since the replaced parts also have DEC P/Ns on them, I'm guessing this was depot-level repair long enough ago that the chips were expensive enough that it made sense to do that level of rework.
We have all the manuals as well as the schematics from the H785 which is more or less the same except one PCB which makes 12V from 15V.The 11/60 Cabinet and Power Supply manual has a lot of detail on how the H7850 works.

Isn't that the H785 Control Board, for which you state that you already have the schematics?We have all the manuals as well as the schematics from the H785 which is more or less the same except one PCB which makes 12V from 15V.
...
We are now focusing on this little PCB:
View attachment 1321829
Yes it is, but I hoped that we find a more detailed "theory of operations" for this complex little part somewhere ...Isn't that the H785 Control Board, for which you state that you already have the schematics?
We decided that a LED is more robust in compare with a bulb and @Konstantin calculated it in order to pull the same current as a 6V 200mA bulb.What is the reason for a 3W resistor with the LED?
Well the FMPS isn't going to tell you that. I do have a paper copy of the H7850 schematic but that is just the battery backup regulator. It does show the straight-thru connections from J2 & J3 to P4 (which I presume connects to J4 on the H785).Yes it is, but I hoped that we find a more detailed "theory of operations" for this complex little part somewhere ...
For example, the center chip in this picture (the -4 board above, to the right of the centerline caps, 7th row down):I can't, but I'll take your word for it :-}. So that's what a depot-level repair looks like. Sure was extensive, but mighty clean. What's your hypothesis for having three dozen chip failures? Perhaps all turned out to be marginal WRT timing requirements? How would they have gone about detecting and localizing each of them, then?

While editing some new text for gunkies (https://gunkies.org/wiki/MS11-K_MOS_memory) I realized that the MK11-B uses the same battery backup subsystem as the 11/60. Although the applicable FMPS, MP-00272, is named H785 it includes information for the "BATTERY BACKUP REGULATOR". See page 12 (of 24) in the attached FMPS for the schematic. That drawing is identified as 5412343-0-1 Rev. F; the one in the 11/60 FMPS MP-00575 is identified as 5412343-YA-1 (no Rev). Scan follows:Well the FMPS isn't going to tell you that. I do have a paper copy of the H7850 schematic but that is just the battery backup regulator. It does show the straight-thru connections from J2 & J3 to P4 (which I presume connects to J4 on the H785).
