Any particular reason for the IIci? An LC series (LC III is my favorite) might be good, if you don't mind the pizza-box Macs, and they were fairly common since they were used so much in education.
The look of the IIci and its close relatives appeals to me. The pizza boxes, not so much.
Before you do anything read this:
http://www.applefool.com/se30/
Thanks. I'll read that later this evening.
My personal opinion is that it's way overkill to build a IIci system just to act as an localtalk bridge.
Oh, I don't dispute that at all! I kind of have a hankering to play with a System 7 era 68k Macintosh, so I'm not looking for a IIci
just to act as a LocalTalk bridge.
Almost any other mac (and the Lisa) made before 1998 can also support localtalk
The 512k Macintosh that's due to arrive on my doorstep later this week will be my very first pre-x86, pre-OSX Macintosh, so I don't have any other pre-1998 Mac yet to fill the role. I've been looking at "any other Macs" this morning, trying to pick out just which particular one will bridge between the 512k Mac and my modern computers (in particular, my lovely Macintosh Pro trashcan), give me a SuperDrive floppy for maximum flexibility, visually appeal to me all on its own, and let me play around with later classic MacOS. System 7 particularly piques my curiosity. I'm not really motivated to get into the Power Macs just yet, but maybe sometime I will; the "Outrigger" case design kind of appeals to me. In any case, the IIci looks like a sweet spot of features, appearance, capability, and age to scratch this particular itch. It may not be the last classic Macintosh to join my collection... just the second.
there are localtalk cards for PC (I used to connect my 512K mac to a Novell Server)
I'm not very enthusiastic about PCs, so I don't want to go that route.
and stand alone ethernet to localtalk bridges.
If I trip over one of those, that might be worth playing with. It wouldn't be as fun as another medium-old Macintosh, but could be useful.
Also don't bother with apple's localtalk connectors, use Farallon PhoneNet connectors and phone cords. The DB-9 version was very common and should not be hard to find.
Rick
I'd prefer to use the Apple ones, just for the full Apple aesthetic experience. Not for any practical reasons, for sure, or else I'd look for the PhoneNet ones. I probably would have used PhoneNet if I was a Mac user back in the day. Heck, if I find just the right computer and it happens to come with PhoneNet adapters then I'll use them. But as long as I'm looking for them, the silly Apple ones with their &!^@$# Mini-DIN connectors are my first preference.