"Barry" wrote:
>> I sure hope you're not explaining this to me! ;-)
>> I do do quite a bit of work with these types of
>> systems, so I know! ;-)
> I don't know anybody here and I don't know
> what anybody knows.
Sorry, it's just I get a little cockey sometimes, I
wasn't sure who the respondant was ment to be.
Reason I thought it was for me, was you just
happen to start by discussion what the numbers
after the CPU represent (which is what I'm still
not sure about!) & because this is such a old
thread brought back to life, I couldn't remember
if someone had suggested it (which I thought
they did), or it was just a thought.
> I'm just trying to answer a question.
> This is fun stuff for me. If you already know
> about this, maybe somebody else doesn't.
Well, that's another thing I was unsure. That's
perfectly fine if you're giving to the group as a
hole, which is why I'm guessing you didn't
have a respondants in question at the start.
> I do know that when I talk with experienced
> programmers they hardly ever have the
> same experience that I had. I enjoy hearing
> the things they know and sharing what I
> know. If I already know something they
> share that's okay. Almost everybody knows
> something I don't know about and they'll
> get to it in time.
Well, I try to agree with that, but as natural
since you're new here, I'm sorry if I came
over as hostile, sometimes I get cranky if
I see something which is in reference to
stuff I wrote with stuff I'd picked up
elsewhere. Trouble is, I pick up stuff from
all around & it get muddled sometimes. I
wasn't sure about the number after the
CPUs or FPUs.
Cheers,
CP/M User.