kishy
Veteran Member
I've debated posting this because of "egg-on-face", but I figure nobody else is more qualified to answer my question:
I did an incredibly stupid thing in my haste to accomplish something, and put my XT-IDE (ver 1, from the very beginning way back when) into an ISA slot backwards and powered on the machine. The mounting plate wasn't attached and the motherboard wasn't in a case, so this was not as hard to do as one might expect. Yes, very stupid. No, the system did not POST, in case you were wondering.
The card is now dead, unsurprisingly (motherboard is fine though, go figure). It still seems to "take" (for lack of better understanding) the memory address it is configured for, as certain BIOS complain about a ROM checksum error at the address the card is configured for (and those errors will follow configuration changes on the card).
Following my error, I visually inspected the card and found no components or traces were burnt. No "magic smoke" was visibly released, nor did I smell any. I felt each component, and only one had become warm: the EEPROM itself.
I tried to use the flashing utility to put firmware back on the chip (long shot, I figured) and it complained about the chip not responding in the right way. I don't recall the exact phrasing but it was something to that effect.
What are my chances that it's only the EEPROM that got toasted? I imagine someone who knows the design of this card pretty well might be able to comment to that effect.
Additionally, if it was just the EEPROM, if I install a new one, can the flashing utility write that chip in the card given that the new chip will not already contain a previous version of the XT-IDE BIOS?
I did an incredibly stupid thing in my haste to accomplish something, and put my XT-IDE (ver 1, from the very beginning way back when) into an ISA slot backwards and powered on the machine. The mounting plate wasn't attached and the motherboard wasn't in a case, so this was not as hard to do as one might expect. Yes, very stupid. No, the system did not POST, in case you were wondering.
The card is now dead, unsurprisingly (motherboard is fine though, go figure). It still seems to "take" (for lack of better understanding) the memory address it is configured for, as certain BIOS complain about a ROM checksum error at the address the card is configured for (and those errors will follow configuration changes on the card).
Following my error, I visually inspected the card and found no components or traces were burnt. No "magic smoke" was visibly released, nor did I smell any. I felt each component, and only one had become warm: the EEPROM itself.
I tried to use the flashing utility to put firmware back on the chip (long shot, I figured) and it complained about the chip not responding in the right way. I don't recall the exact phrasing but it was something to that effect.
What are my chances that it's only the EEPROM that got toasted? I imagine someone who knows the design of this card pretty well might be able to comment to that effect.
Additionally, if it was just the EEPROM, if I install a new one, can the flashing utility write that chip in the card given that the new chip will not already contain a previous version of the XT-IDE BIOS?
Last edited: