- VCF SoCal - February 17 - 18, Hotel Fera, Orange CA
- VCF East - April 5 - 7, Infoage Museum, Wall NJ
- VCF South West - June 14 - 16, Davidson-Gundy Alumni Center at University of Texas at Dallas
- VCF West - Aug 2 - 3, Computer History Museum, Mountain View, CA
- VCF Midwest - App. Sept 2024, Waterford Banquet, IL
-
Please review our updated Terms and Rules here
yuhong's latest activity
-
Yyuhong replied to the thread 386 or 486 with Hercules/MDA as primary or only graphics adapter.reminds me of this: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.os2.advocacy/c/Z3pFyFanRn8/m/QadNvLspaiMJ (I assume that the 386SX only barely...
-
Yyuhong replied to the thread I assume that the 74LS181 (not 74181) didn't became common.....Which reminds me of projects like the TV Typewriter. It probably helped that acoustic couplers were legal thanks to Hush-a-Phone and...
-
Yyuhong replied to the thread I assume that the 74LS181 (not 74181) didn't became common.....Though early microprocessors were expensive as well. It took until MOS Technology 6502 for the cost to come down.
-
Yyuhong replied to the thread I assume that the 74LS181 (not 74181) didn't became common.....Part of the reason I suggested the 74LS181 is that before the 74LSxxx chips were invented these 74xxx chips would also have consumed a...
-
Yyuhong replied to the thread I assume that the 74LS181 (not 74181) didn't became common.....In this case I used the 74LS181, which also consumed less power.
-
Yyuhong replied to the thread I assume that the 74LS181 (not 74181) didn't became common.....(For those that are not well aware, 74LSxxx consumes much less power than the original 74xxx chips)
-
Yyuhong posted the thread I assume that the 74LS181 (not 74181) didn't became common.... in Vintage Computer Hardware.until the microprocessor became common, right? It would be funny if the 74LS181 caught on instead of the microprocessor.