Now I'm also curious: I'd have thought that by the time half-height drives arrived they'd all have been DS; got a make/model example?Just curious, why a single-sided one specifically? They exist, but are pretty thin on the ground in half-height form factor. On the other hand, a double-sided drive is easier to find and can handle single-sided floppies just as well.
Now I'm also curious: I'd have thought that by the time half-height drives arrived they'd all have been DS; got a make/model example?
Yeah, I was only thinking standard PC-types, but not thinking very clearly since I have the MBC-555 that Chuck mentioned as an example... Duh!I haven't seen any for IBM compatibles, but plenty of other brands used half-height, single-sided floppy drives: Apple, Commodore, Atari, Radio Shack, etc...
Anyway, isn't the data encoding a feature of the disk controller, whether it is a circuit board mounted onto the drive mech or part of an expansion or motherboard in the other end of the cable? With that I mean the mech itself might be usable with either kind of encoding depending on the circuitry it is used with.
Yeah, as a rule the drive doesn't care about the encoding method, FM, M2FM, MFM, GCR, whatever, and the second side of a two-sided drive is simply ignored by a single-side controller. The TPI and density have to match of course and the logic of the interface signals might be a little different, but that usually just involves changing some jumpers.Anyway, isn't the data encoding a feature of the disk controller, whether it is a circuit board mounted onto the drive mech or part of an expansion or motherboard in the other end of the cable? With that I mean the mech itself might be usable with either kind of encoding depending on the circuitry it is used with.
I have 2 TEAC drives (HH, 360K, 40 track, MFM) Model # FD-55BV-06-U, that I can part with. Where are you located? My zip is 08005.