You are kidding, right?
First, it is not a dot matrix printer. It is a thermal printer.
Second, you should keep in mind that you are criticizing the output of a 25+ year old thermal printer, and the paper is probably just as old. These printers used friction feed; the parts of the printer are old now and the friction feed mechanism is probably not working perfectly anymore. The paper is positively ancient - thermal paper does not age well, so being aghast at the non-uniform text contrast doesn't make sense.
I think the print of the RLE is actually pretty good considering the age of the unit.
It uses standard Epson codes. Your concerns about not having drivers are not warranted. (I wrote the simple program that printed that RLE.)
First, it is not a dot matrix printer. It is a thermal printer.
Second, you should keep in mind that you are criticizing the output of a 25+ year old thermal printer, and the paper is probably just as old. These printers used friction feed; the parts of the printer are old now and the friction feed mechanism is probably not working perfectly anymore. The paper is positively ancient - thermal paper does not age well, so being aghast at the non-uniform text contrast doesn't make sense.
I think the print of the RLE is actually pretty good considering the age of the unit.
It uses standard Epson codes. Your concerns about not having drivers are not warranted. (I wrote the simple program that printed that RLE.)