"vic user" wrote:
> You have no idea how refreshing this is to be
> talking about Dr. Who! Most people I talk to
> about Dr. Who, are just humouring me
> I have only seen Planet of Giants on TV, and
> that was a couple of years ago, so I can't
> remember seeing quality differences.
Yeah, the video I have was came out in 2002,
so I guess what you saw was the transformation,
though I guess you can't tell with these things,
they could have shown the old print to it.
I certainally noticed the difference, because it
increased the amount of frames (or something)
which brought a smoother moving picture. It
was more noticable when they were doing the
camera movements.
> The Aztecs is a good one, especially with the
> Doctor and Comika? That old woman who
> flirts with him. Interesting side to the Doctor.
Heh!
> If they have Keys of Marinus on dvd, I would
> love to get that one!
Haven't seen it on DVD as yet here, there've just
brought out the Two Doctors with Patrick Troughton
& Colin Baker, which is perhaps the one I liked
most when Colin Baker was the main doctor.
I've got Key of Marinus on Video, but would love
to get that on DVD when it comes out, I think it's
clever in how each story they face a challenge &
it all comes back to finding the keys!
> The scene where all the cybermen are coming
> down from the tombs is wicked! Maybe your
> friend will lend you the dvd, so you can see the
> difference in quality. I wonder what the added
> stuff is too?
No, well I haven't see him in quite some time, so
I don't know if they have a DVD or if they would
have Tomb of the Cybermen on DVD, they lent
me the video when it came out (around 1992 I
believe), I'll just buy it regardless, cause that's
another one I like.
> Tomb, is one story I never thought I would see.
> Tenth Planet was another one of those stories
> that was lost and then found, except for the
> final episode. I freaked when I saw that one
> available for sale!
No, actually in the Dr. Who 20th Anniversary Special
catalogue it mentions that the first 3 episodes were
always around (they were never deleted), it was just
the last episode which was deleted & they have never
been able to find. It explains with the video what
happened with the last episode & why it was deleted,
though I think it's amazing how they used photo
images & how they were about to put merge a moving
image from a photo image (with images they had
found) & then complete the end where the Doctor
changes his appearence (with the material that had
of that).
However, I can say that the late Hartnell story which
was missing (& now on video) is the War Machines. I
thought that was another great story. At one stage
(in the 20th Anniversary special catalogue) it mentioned
that episode 1, 3 & 4 were missing. While they have done
well in obtaining footage (from all sorts of different
sources), some of it is still missing, though they have
at least collected enough material to make it watchable
& enjoyable!
> I don't know if you have some of the stories with missing
> episodes, but I think BBC do a good job of using still images,
> voice overs, and narration, to fill in these missing episodes.
On video, yes I basically got all the stories which have missing
episodes or which are complete stories which have been missing at
one stage or another. There are a couple of Hartnell stories I
don't have (The Darlek Invasion of Earth, The Chase & The Web
Planet, I think that's about the ones I don't have, one of the 2
mention I've already seen on DVD - TDIOE, but price has been
dragging me back).
But of the audio CDs which have been introduced of stories which
are missing, I think it's great what they have been able to do
with it & put someone in those stories which were part of the
stories originally. I don't have a lot of those either, because
I've been either too short of money, or haven't seen the stories
which I don't have (which I know are on CD). Galaxy Four is one
of my favourites featurning the first Doctor & the Chubey's though
the others I've got have been good. The Second Doctor is a much
harder one (because the stories seem to be more gripping & I just
love Patrick Troughton - because he's a bit of a dag!
The
Macra Terror is always been a good one, even though the Faceless
Ones was great as well & so was Enermy of the World. I also got
the Web of Fear, but I found that one to be quite difficult to
follow (for some strange reason, because the read up about it
sounds great!
> I think they are down to 103 missing episodes, all from
> the Hartnell and Troughton eras. I could be wrong about the
> number.
In the box set of the Crusade, they say there's 109, but they
might have found some since (that was the last story I got
which had one of the episodes of the Crusade recovered). They
did that one back in June 1999!
> They just found an episode of Dalek MasterPlan, which
> I would just love to see, since Nicolas Courtney plays a
> space pilot in that one!
I've known for quite some time that one of the episodes of
the Dalek Master Plan wasn't lost (I can't remember which,
I think it was 6 or 7).
> Another thing i love about Dr. Who, is seeing actors in one
> story, and then a few years leater, there they are again
> playing someone completely different!
The only one who comes to mind is Derek Newmark(?) who was in
the first Dr. Who story (An Unearthy child) & then made a
return in Inferno (which ironically enough was the last story
to feature the original tardis console - if you didn't already
know). I though he was great in Inferno, in An Unearthy Child
he played one of the Cave people. Of course there's that bloke
from the Crusade (Julian Glover) which went on to be a movie
actor in some of the big movies!
But yeah, if you're speaking of Nicolas Courtney comming back
as another character & then yeah, it's great. Whenever I watch
the War Machines now, I always think that perhaps that story
was the creation of Unit, for when they get in the military
people to destroy those machines, though I suppose the Web of
Fear could have done that as well (it's very hard because you
simply can't watch it).
> I have all but 3 Jon Pertwee stories, so almost done with him.
He was like a companion when he was with Jon Pertwee, Inferno
would have to be one of my favourites from Jon, cause it's got
everything (even humor at the end & start!
Even though I've
got it on video, the DVD would be worth getting, IMO getting
that is a step foward towards greater technology! ;-)
> Then I am going to focus on Hartnell and Troughton.
I have all the Troughton stories (except for the Two Doctors
if you include Troughton & Jamie in that) & the Troughton
Years (or the Cybermen years which had episodes 1 & 2 I think
of the Moonbase), even the Ice Warriors (which you probably
won't find now, since it was a limited edition video - though
they'll probably come out with that on DVD). I pretty much
liked all the Troughton stories I got, but Tomb of the
Cybermen, The Ice Warriors, The Invasion, The Seeds of Death
& The War Games are the ones which stand out as being some
of the better ones I got on Video. The Invasion was great
(even though episodes 1 & 4 are missing, though Nicholas
Courtney does a good job at filling in those Missing Episodes).
Perhaps if it comes out on DVD, they'll use the techniques
they used in the Ice Warriors & The Tenth Plannet to link it
all up (hope they do!
> I wonder what the actors thought about Rope?
I don't think it bothered James Stewart a bit, because when
he was asked what his worse movie was, he said Pot o' Gold.
I've got Pot o' Gold on Video as part of a James Stewart 3
pack (with It's a Wonderful Life & Made for each other being
the other 2 movies & incidently brought because of It's a
Wonderful Life being on there! ;-) Pot o' Gold is perhaps
not one of his better movies, but it's watchable & a little
bit funny!
Rope wasn't exactly James Stewart's favourite movie that
he'd done, I just found out recently when I brought the
movie Harvey which had an interview on the DVD with James
Stewart (from 1990 or there abouts) enjoyed doing this
movie so much. He'd probably have perfered doing Rope,
than having a layed back role in Rear Window! ;-)
> Did they like shooting a film like that?
It wasn't so much the way they did it, I believe, the main
issue behind the filming was the amount of money spent on
the amount of tape used, it was quite expensive from what
I've heard & it would be extremely difficult to put this
practice into any movie I should think. It's very difficult
to explain, because the documtary I saw was quite some time
ago, which explained more properly the expense at filming
this way & cause Rope was only a short movie, which was part
of the cost issues faced from filming. Any mistakes done
from the actors would have also costed a significant amount
in re-filming (I suppose).
> It still blows my mind when I hear that most movies are filmed
> out of sequence.
Then you wouldn't like to be the person editing the film then! ;-)
Cheers,
CP/M User.