Terry Yager said:
After much eBay experience, I've come to hate the very word "rare," and I try not to use it, but sometimes, there's just no other word to adequately describe an item. Some computers really are rare.
--T
I'm not a big fan of Ebay either (for various reasons) - But I won't stop
using a word because It gets abused on Ebay - I don't consider Ebay to
be a defining influence on my use of the language.
I do take exception of my classifications of "Common, Uncommon, Rare
and One-of-a-kind" and an 'R' next to a machine listing being compared
to "***L@@K*** --- RARE --- ONE OF A KIND ITEM YOU'LL **NEVER**
SEE ANYWHERE ELSE!!!".
A fair number of people who visit the site don't really know a lot about
machines older than recent wintel crops - I've tried to present a SIMPLE
indicator as to how common these machines are. It is entirely subjective,
and mostly based on my experience in finding the machine in the first
place, and in locating information about it or references to it. I suppose
I could use "Really Uncommon" but would that really convey any more
information than "Rare".
Rare means "hard to find", not "impossible to find" - my top rating is "One
of a kind", and you may have noticed that it gets applied only to those few
machines which truly deserve it (usually handbuilts).
If I had an Apple-1, Scelibi, Kenbak or a few others, I would add a new
catagory to identify truly-impossible-to-find machines, but so far that
hasn't been an issue :-( - "Rare" seems the most appropriate word to
describe machines which you are unlikely to come across without really
looking for one).
FWIW: None of the machines in my collection are for sale, nor have they
been for sale - on Ebay or any other forum. I have nothing to gain from
"perception management" - I try to represent a fair picture of the artifacts
in my collection for the benefit of interested parties. If you disagree with
any of the information listed on my site, please do contact me with details.
I have revised classifications and other information many times already,
and I have no problem with adjusting the site based on changes to the
information I have available.
Regards,
Dave