• Please review our updated Terms and Rules here

floppy for IBM PC convertible (5140)

"Terry Yager" wrote:

> IBM Compatability:

> Legend (urban?) has it that the way
> IBM-compatability was determined
> back in the day, was to attempt to
> run the 100 top-selling IBM programs
> for that week. If 95 of 'em ran ok,
> then the computer was considered to
> be 95% IBM compatable, etc.

Actually, when I first got into IBM & IBM
compatable programs, one of the first
games I got (which supported CGA)
specifically stated 100% IBM
compatability.

95% IMO isn't good enough. Which is
why I think that systems which are like
this, don't fall into the IBM compatability
list.

They should have done like they did with
the Victor 9000 & make better hardware
which beated the IBM standards. At least
show it was better than an IBM of the
time! ;-)

Cheers,
CP/M User.
 
CP/M User said:
"Terry Yager" wrote:

> IBM Compatability:

Actually, when I first got into IBM & IBM
compatable programs, one of the first
games I got (which supported CGA)
specifically stated 100% IBM
compatability.

95% IMO isn't good enough. Which is
why I think that systems which are like
this, don't fall into the IBM compatability
list.

They should have done like they did with
the Victor 9000 & make better hardware
which beated the IBM standards. At least
show it was better than an IBM of the
time! ;-)

Cheers,
CP/M User.

I tend to think of those older machines as coming in three classes:

1) Compatable (100%)
2) Almost compatable (about 90 - 99%)
3) Incompatable (everything else)

I agree that some of those less-than-100%-compatable machines were in some ways better than IBM, like the Tandy 2000 (which would run some IBM programs, if you could get them on the proper disk format). It was one of the few machines that used the 80186 processor.

--T
 
"Terry Yager" wrote:

> I tend to think of those older machines
> as coming in three classes:

> 1) Compatable (100%)
> 2) Almost compatable (about 90 - 99%)
> 3) Incompatable (everything else)

> I agree that some of those
> less-than-100%-compatable machines
> were in some ways better than IBM, like
> the Tandy 2000 (which would run some
> IBM programs, if you could get them on
> the proper disk format). It was one of
> the few machines that used the 80186
> processor.

What those machines really need is an
emulator, which could at least perform like
an IBM Personal Computer or XT perhaps?

As you say, some of them are superior to
the IBM, so with the right sort of program
it could be more a true IBM! :)

Cheers,
CP/M User.
 
CP/M User said:
What those machines really need is an
emulator, which could at least perform like
an IBM Personal Computer or XT perhaps?

As you say, some of them are superior to
the IBM, so with the right sort of program
it could be more a true IBM! :)

Cheers,
CP/M User.

Even the venerable Victor/Sirius 9000, in it's latter years, came out with an add-in called the Plus PC (or PC Plus?) board which made it (more) IBM compatable. They even managed to get the Victor's "wierd" disk drives to read/write/format IBM style disks.

--T
 
"Terry Yager" wrote:

> Even the venerable Victor/Sirius 9000, in
> it's latter years, came out with an add-in
> called the Plus PC (or PC Plus?) board
> which made it (more) IBM compatable.
> They even managed to get the Victor's
> "wierd" disk drives to read/write/format
> IBM style disks.

Well see that's great, but I never knew about
this hardware which made Sir Vic 9000 more
compatable.

Of course this machine came out well before
the IBM (or so I've read somewhere I
believe).

Would have thought it would have revitialised
that machine though!

Cheers,
CP/M User.
 
CP/M User said:
Well see that's great, but I never knew about
this hardware which made Sir Vic 9000 more
compatable.

Of course this machine came out well before
the IBM (or so I've read somewhere I
believe).

Would have thought it would have revitialised
that machine though!

Cheers,
CP/M User.

One of the first two Victors I had was equipped with one. Unfortunatly, it had been left in a garage for several years, and the plus board was corroded way beyond any hope of repair. The good news is that it came with a large pile of software and manualage! It didn't cost me anything except the gas to drive about 40 miles (into the backwoods) to pick 'em up. Some guy had put an ad in the paper that he had a couple of computers, free for the picking up, so I went out to have a look. Sure enough, he had two Victors. The second machine fared better than it's sister, and actually worked when I got it home, but no Plus board in it. The documentation for the plus was there, so I knew wat it was and what it was s'pozed to do. A few years (and several Victors) later, I was in the computer store when a lady brought in another 9000 hoping to use it as a trade in. This one even had the very hard to find hard drive, but refused to boot from it. We got it to boot to a floppy tho. Mark was in the process of giving her the ol' "we can't give you anything for it , but we'll gladly take it off your hands" speech, when I brought to his attention that the keyboard had some very interesting stickers attached to some of the keytops, with labels like "alt" and others not found on the usual Victor keyboard, but which are on the IBM. This got his curiosity up, so we took the time to remove the 2 screws from the back and have a look inside. Sure enough, there was the plus board installed in it. That instantly raised the value of it (to a collector like Mark), so he gave her $20. for it, which she was happy to get.
The plus board comes in (at least) two completely different versions. The (dead) one in my old machine was a large daughterboard that was mounted "piggy-back" on the mainboard, but the one (working) in Mark's machine is a regular expansion card that plugs into one of the slots.
As far as revitalising the machine (and possibly saving the company), I don't think it was non-IBM-compatability that caused the death of the Victor. I think the cause was purely economic. The V 9000 was a very expensive machine, costing around $5000.00 (without the plus option). You could get a real IBM-PC for about half that much at the time. (The base PC listed for $2205.00 in 1985).

--T
 
"Terry Yager" wrote:

> One of the first two Victors I had was
> equipped with one. Unfortunatly, it
> had been left in a garage for several
> years, and the plus board was corroded
> way beyond any hope of repair. The
> good news is that it came with a large
> pile of software and "manualage"! It
> didn't cost me anything except the gas
> to drive about 40 miles (into the
> backwoods) to pick 'em up. Some guy
> had put an ad in the paper that he had
> a couple of computers, free for the
> picking up, so I went out to have a
> look. Sure enough, he had two
> Victors. The second machine fared
> better than it's sister, and actually
> worked when I got it home, but no
> Plus board in it. The documentation
> for the plus was there, so I knew wat
> it was and what it was s'pozed to do.
> A few years (and several Victors) later,
> I was in the computer store when a
> lady brought in another 9000 hoping
> to use it as a trade in. This one even
> had the very hard to find hard drive,
> but refused to boot from it.

I had a simular case with my first IBM
(an XT) which had one of those early
Hard Disks (the one where you had to
tell the hard disk to park itself - through
a program). It was a mystery which
was never solved, until I tried to recover
it. I got it to boot, but figured the Hard
Disk must of being faulty because it
didn't hold it's info for long, or would
corrupt it. So, I figured the Hard Disk
has gone.

I still have my XT, in case I want to do
something else, like add another more
modern Hard Disk to it, or perhaps just
a floppy & run a network from it to one
of my 386 Hard Disks or perhaps a
Superdisk - if it can do it!

> We got it to boot to a floppy tho. Mark
> was in the process of giving her the ol'
> "we can't give you anything for it ,
> but we'll gladly take it off your hands"
> speech, when I brought to his attention
> that the keyboard had some very
> interesting stickers attached to some
> of the keytops, with labels like "alt"
> and others not found on the usual
> Victor keyboard, but which are on the
> IBM. This got his curiosity up, so we
> took the time to remove the 2 screws
> from the back and have a look inside.
> Sure enough, there was the plus board
> installed in it. That instantly raised the
> value of it (to a collector like Mark), so
> he gave her $20. for it, which she was
> happy to get.

> The plus board comes in (at least) two
> completely different versions. The
> (dead) one in my old machine was a
> large daughterboard that was mounted
> "piggy-back" on the mainboard, but the
> one (working) in Mark's machine is a
> regular expansion card that plugs into
> one of the slots.

> As far as revitalising the machine (and
> possibly saving the company), I don't
> think it was non-IBM-compatability that
> caused the death of the Victor. I think
> the cause was purely economic. The V
> 9000 was a very expensive machine,
> costing around $5000.00 (without the
> plus option). You could get a "real"
> IBM-PC for about half that much at the
> time. (The base PC listed for $2205.00
> in 1985).

Well that's also a good possibility, I
remember you telling me this once before,
but I keep forgetting everytime I open
that book & look at those machines. Price
is usually the last thing to consider. It
book hasn't helped either, because it fails
to mention this, but it had to talk about
the price tag of the Apple Lisa didn't it! :)

It's also why Apple are second to IBM in
the stakes. No matter how more
sofisicated the public get, they always go
for that cheaper machine! Oh well, I guess
it's better when they throw it out 3 years
down the track to buy a new one! ;-)

I think "Sir Vic 9000" has a form of honor
to it, unfortunately no-one will know what
I'm talking about when I'm talking about
it NeXT time! ;-)
 
CP/M User said:
I think "Sir Vic 9000" has a form of honor
to it, unfortunately no-one will know what
I'm talking about when I'm talking about
it NeXT time! ;-)

Oh, some people will remember: I was watching a show on PBS a few years ago, in which several PC-industry leaders were competing against one another (for charity, of course) in a sort of trivia contest. The question came up; What was the distinguishing feature of the Victor 9000? (I of course got it right--the variable-speed drives). The question was answered correctly by none other than Bill Gates! (I was surprized that he remembered).

--T
 
"Terry Yager"] wrote:

> Oh, some people will remember: I
> was watching a show on PBS a few
> years ago, in which several
> "PC-industry" leaders were competing
> against one another (for charity, of
> course) in a sort of trivia contest.
> The question came up; What was the
> distinguishing feature of the Victor
> 9000? (I of course got it right--the
> variable-speed drives). The question
> was answered correctly by none other
> than Bill Gates! (I was surprized that
> he remembered).

Perhaps Mr Bates envisioned this would
eventually become the standard for IBMs.

The only problem & the one which might
of stopped IBM from doing this, was trying
to work out a way of having this type of
setup compatable with the other Drives.

But if Mr Bates did in fact hope for
something like this for the IBM-compatable
then it just shows that the top dog doesn't
always get his bone! ;-)

Cheers,
CP/M User.
 
Back
Top