Sort of an interesting issue. Seems like an archaic method that I wonder how far back this would go as it's a somewhat disappointing but simple bug in memory design. Perpaps limited only by older chipsets having a larger size and spacing between transistors.
Explaination of "rowhammer bug". Effectively they're affecting memory next to the address they're reading by continuously probing a row of memory and eventually affecting the row next to it (via ESD if I'm understanding correctly). Eventually they can change the boundary their program is allowed to address and therefore read restricted addresses or try and interject data to other addresses.
Explaination of "rowhammer bug". Effectively they're affecting memory next to the address they're reading by continuously probing a row of memory and eventually affecting the row next to it (via ESD if I'm understanding correctly). Eventually they can change the boundary their program is allowed to address and therefore read restricted addresses or try and interject data to other addresses.