It's on their web site here, and they are about to play the segment on the air:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99950176
Mike
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99950176
Mike
It's on their web site here, and they are about to play the segment on the air:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99950176
Anybody else have issues bouncing around between keyboards of various layouts?
I get a lot of flak about the Model M's that I use at work. Most people are on laptops or cheap keyboards that make little noise. In comparison, when I start typing an email it sounds like a machine gun nest with all of the noise ...
Without the noise, people wouldn't know I was working. ;-)
I guess I'll just have to hang my head in shame. I never could stand the clickety-clackety keyboards. I like quite ones. Unfortunately, it seems a lot of quiet keyboards are also cheap keyboards.
patscc
The original 83-key PC/XT and 84-key AT keyboards have a lighter typing feel than the 101-key Model M. All you feel and hear is the springs buckling, with a crisp metallic twang. The Model M has a noticeably heavier, less crisp feel to its keys. It feels more like they added the springs on top of regular rubber dome-type keys, instead of just using the springs only. I do most of my typing on IBM AT keyboards, and when I switch to a Model M, I can definitely feel myself exerting more pressure through my fingers to make the keys work.I don't like the noise or the feel of 'em. I have a very light touch on the keyboard, and don't like having to bash on the keys to make them work.
The original 83-key PC/XT and 84-key AT keyboards have a lighter typing feel than the 101-key Model M. All you feel and hear is the springs buckling, with a crisp metallic twang. The Model M has a noticeably heavier, less crisp feel to its keys. It feels more like they added the springs on top of regular rubber dome-type keys, instead of just using the springs only. I do most of my typing on IBM AT keyboards, and when I switch to a Model M, I can definitely feel myself exerting more pressure through my fingers to make the keys work.
And unlike many people, I actually prefer the AT keyboard's placement of the Escape key on the numeric keypad. Since so many DOS programs are navigated through the arrow keys, Enter, and Esc, placing Esc right in the middle of that group allows for quick and easy one-hand navigation, without having to reach over or use your left hand to press Esc all the way on the other side of the keyboard...
The original 83-key PC/XT and 84-key AT keyboards have a lighter typing feel than the 101-key Model M. All you feel and hear is the springs buckling, with a crisp metallic twang. The Model M has a noticeably heavier, less crisp feel to its keys. It feels more like they added the springs on top of regular rubber dome-type keys, instead of just using the springs only. I do most of my typing on IBM AT keyboards, and when I switch to a Model M, I can definitely feel myself exerting more pressure through my fingers to make the keys work.
And unlike many people, I actually prefer the AT keyboard's placement of the Escape key on the numeric keypad. Since so many DOS programs are navigated through the arrow keys, Enter, and Esc, placing Esc right in the middle of that group allows for quick and easy one-hand navigation, without having to reach over or use your left hand to press Esc all the way on the other side of the keyboard.
I also like the Apple M0116 and M0115 (orange Alps, made in USA), which have a "chocky" feel, rather than "clicky". You can't really compare them to the buckling spring because they're a different type, but they're very nice keyboards.