Considering this answer is for
you Ray -
I suspect you will find an 11/34a KD11-EA ( M8265/M8266 ) more "your style". A 34a is likely to be more repairable than a 44 - given it's implemented in standard logic, although a 44 is quite a machine. UNIBUS Peripherals could be scavenged from a 44, but by enlarge, other components won't.
Some maintenance prints [with processor flows] for both machines can be
found here. You should look before you leap.
If you do decide on the '34a, try to find one with an KK11-A CACHE module ( M8268 ) and MS11-L (MOS) Memory. Floating Point is a big bonus as well. Those options will give you the hottest setup. Remember a 34 of any kind is limited to 128KW memory.
- Note: The PDP-11/34 ( M7265/M7266 ) is incompatible with CACHE.
I hope I got those details mostly right. We were using an 11/34a [equipped with FP, MOS and CACHE] for an engineering department of 30, doing intense software development on RSX. The machine was definitely crowded, but it was holding up. We moved directly from that system to an 11/70. The boss heard of a deal - DEC engineering was selling one of theirs. Funny story - Our company was a Union manufacturing shop, so we had an annual "Shut Down" when all Union personnel were required to take their vacations. Anyway, we "Exempt" R&D types worked through Shut Down, but most of the administrative folks were out too. Kinda nice to have the run of the place. Well, a couple days into Shut Down, this deal comes up. Somehow, my boss got a P.E.A.R. [Capitol Expenditure Request Authorization] through
During Shut Down. The other managers were flabbergasted.
So, we moved onto the 70, and it lasted us a whole year before we had to get a "Huge" disk for it. [RA81]. My mistake... in retrospect, I should have gone with RA60's. [RA81's were UDA50 UNIBUS connected, RA60's were MASSBUS RH70 devices]
I digress... My point is: We skipped the '44 altogether. A
properly equipped 34a, will be a super-duper UNIBUS system for you, even though it doesn't have that Switch Console.