eeguru
Veteran Member
No XC9572XL. I believe in having margin - especially in old electronics. I just don't believe the MOS 3.3V I/Os will be able to source enough drive current for every odd ball mismatched impedance ISA bus or IDE drive people try and plug in. If a mismatched line causes too much of a draw and the I/O sags even a little, it's possible the drive or bus may not register a one. I know you've done a lot of successful compatibility testing, but I just don't see the point in saving $4.5 when there is an equivalent part in plentiful supply with a built-in LDO and 5V buffers. And nothing on this board will be SMT. Again if both the TQFP-100 and the PLCC-84 packages in plentiful supply, I don't see the choice in the former. This board wont be fulfilled by Seeed but by end users with soldering irons. That's really where the design focus differs. Just my $.02.