• Please review our updated Terms and Rules here

Honeywell 200 resurrection

Here's some evidence that I am making progress with building the memory for the project, even though my progress doesn't include updating my website yet. IMG_0525a.jpg

The lower trace is the negative-going timing pulse for a memory write and the upper trace is the current from a memory driver circuit during a complete read/write cycle. The current flows forward through the core winding during the read cycle and then backwards during the write, or at least it will when I am confident enough to connect up the core memory itself. This proves that at least some of the salvaged logic boards are still working and that I've connected them together correctly. I am currently checking that the address decoding logic is always selecting the correct combinations of driver circuits, which is a long job when done by hand with a scope.
 
Today I made real progress with the memory unit. Having wired in two of the nine sense amplifiers I detected pulses from them when the unit was cycled. Deselecting either X or Y drive current made them disappear, so they must have been coming from cores flipping as they were alternately read and written. This is the first sign that there's any chance of getting the memory working, so it's an encouragement to get on with the rest of the work. Okay, so I've only tested four bits in an 8k byte memory so far, but it's a start.

Fortunately the circuit boards for the unit, which were salvaged from a scrap heap decades ago, are almost all working with only the odd component needing replacement so far. The key issue is the condition of the core memory modules themselves though.

For a short while I tried installing all the boards so far in use at the same time to see how my power supplies coped. From the results I think they'll need to be upgraded soon. I'll need some fans on the test bench as well to run any prolonged tests. This old technology really soaks up the power.
 
RobS - I see that you are working on memory set-up. I remember doing that and I think that I have (somewhere) a couple of UK-produced booklets on the subject. One is for main memory and one is for control memory. If you think that they could be useful, let me know and I'll try to dig them out and get them to you.
 
The visual style of the H-200

Rob S

Later models in the series (the Model 2200 and Model 4200) broke away from the low-boy style of the earlier models, though they still used the low logic cabinets for peripheral control units. The 2200 had a tall-boy style (as did the optional 1100 Floating Point Unit). The 4200 began to look a bit like the IBM 360.

Alan Jardine (just practising!)
 
Introductory Message

Introductory Message

Yesterday, I read Rob's article on his HoneyPi project in the current issue of the Bulletin of the (British) Computer Conservation Society. I made contact with Rob, we swapped some H200 information and I decided to sign up here.

I was employed by Honeywell from 1965 to 1974 and worked almost exclusively on the Series 200 / 2000 range of computers. Eventually, the Series consisted of the Models 120, 125, 200, 1200, 2200, 3200 and 4200. (There was a Model 8200 but it was a hybrid of the 200 and 800 architectures. I don't think any were installed outside of North America.)

I thought I'd share what I remember about the Series 200 in here before my own "main memory" fades. If anyone has a particular question, I'll try to answer.

Regards,
Alan Jardine.
 
Yesterday, I read Rob's article on his HoneyPi project in the current issue of the Bulletin of the (British) Computer Conservation Society.
If anyone wants to read the article the bulletin in accessible here. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/CCS/res/res66.htm Note that my project is not one operated or funded by the CCS; they focus on British computer technology but the editor liked the article and included it. I've been busy with other things this summer, so haven't had any progress to report.
 
I just got a H200 FORTRAN D manual! This appears to be an earlier version than the 6.0 I used in 1975 to learn programming. I have not seen this on line in PDF form. Has anyone? If not, shall I scan it?

IMG_20141017_112734.jpgIMG_20141017_112434.jpg
 
I was using H200 FORTRAN D in 1971. That software is most unlikely to exist any more, much like everything else connected with the H200.

By the way, I noticed that someone has registered the domain name honeypi.co.uk, very similar to my own. The spooky thing is that he has the same name as me. His website is about holidaying in Devon, England though. How's that for getting off topic?
 
what manuals are you missing that are not elsewhere already other than H200 Fortran? 197x's would really be well past the H200's heyday. The H200 was replaced by Honeywell with newer models into the late 60's.

I just found in my library a nice set of product one-sheets and a comparison between the IBM 1401 - H200. Also, an upgrade path doc that describes why one should not replace an IBM 1401 with a H200. Rather the doc describes how one could upgrade a 1401 into the H300 or H800. I.e. the H200 is a replacement without ability to expand any more so than the 1401, so why bother. I can research and post my take of a typical H200 system and correctly configured peripherals that would work together. I see from your site there is a bit of speculation as to what the peripherals would be. I have more on the H800 than the H200, but I have enough to get their place in the mid 60's compared with IBM, etc. You may already have all of this info, I don't mean to assume anything. I just like to do research and would be happy to help.

One last little thing...I think your control panel is a hair too tall. The actual was thinner than your mockup.

Bill
 
Last edited:
what manuals are you missing that are not elsewhere already other than H200 Fortran?
What do I know that I don't know yet? That's a philosophical question that defies an answer, I think, but my head is already spinning with such problems and they are outside the scope of this thread. In practical terms the engineer's instructions for setting up the timings of the core memory would be a great help at present and I would dearly love to get a copy of the assembly listing of the Easycoder A assembler in order to reproduce the original package, but otherwise anything that anyone might find is bound to be of some historical interest. Send me a private message with more details outside the thread to explain what you have if you like.

I worked on a purely Honeywell site as our company bought its first computer at the height of the H200 sales campaign and we had no legacy interest in IBM, so for us it wasn't a question of migration. Also our software needs were so specialised that we had to write it all in house and commercially available IBM-compatible packages were of no interest. Our expansion path led smoothly through the H1200 and H2200 into the series 60 range acquired from GE and the subsequent management decision to migrate to IBM decades later did us no favours as there were still no commercial software packages available for IBM machines that really met our needs. For this reason my only experience of IBM mainframe technology dates from the time when it was looking antiquated and being replaced by networked pc-based server technology. Understandably my interest centres on the H200 alone and comparisons between it and the 1401 are outside my scope, but others may find them interesting.

Regarding the peripherals, my website refers to the impractibility of reproducing genuine H200 peripherals rather than questioning what they were. I know of someone who owns a Honeywell tape drive from the era and his problems with installing it and getting it working are significant. I sent him some spare parts that I had but personally I'd rather just focus on the CPU.

I never encountered the H800. That was more of a number cruncher than the 200 series, which was better suited to our data processing needs. That said, we used the 200 series to do pretty complex actuarial computations from first principles and the small programme on my website is a demonstration of how a very small H200 could tackle significant tasks of that kind despite not being designed for the purpose. In fact my computations of actuarial tables on the H200 identified misprints in the official books of tables published for use with desktop calculators. That was amusing as our actuarial department made the comparison to confirm that I'd got my algorithms right rather than to check the official tables.

I haven't done any work on the project for about nine months but now that the cold weather has returned I probably will as the circuits are less likely to overheat and they'll help to warm up the house.
 
One last little thing...I think your control panel is a hair too tall. The actual was thinner than your mockup.
My mockup pictures were based on available images with their inherent perspective problems and Honeywell's own assembly diagrams held in our national science archives, which probably weren't to scale. Apart from that the scale was determined from the pushbuttons used as I have actual examples of them in my collection. Despite my best efforts I never did manage to reconcile all these sources of information to each other exactly and publication of my attempts was a ploy to get anyone who knew better to tell me, so thank you. One very time-consuming task was getting all the text on the panel looking authentic, so I hope that doesn't merit any criticism. One little detail was that in earlier machines there was a button labelled "Central Clear" whereas later the same function was apparently performed by one labelled "System Clear". On available images of actual panels it is very difficult to see which wording was used but I'm pretty sure that it was the former. I am still hoping that my contact in California does have the genuine article in his possession so that my deliberations about the panel are academic.
 
Well I think this is an awesome project. The key is to just move forward, you can always circle back and change things later.

I will scan some info I hope you and anyone interested might find useful. I will post when I have something online.

The B-200 as I read recently came with the option as a line item to purchase IBM 1401 emulation software. Sounds like you are saying in your case this was not needed.

Thanks for sharing and nice site!
 
Here is a link to a set of docs I think you'll find useful:
http://vintagecomputer.net/browse_thread.cfm?id=589

Thanks. They are very interesting. At the date of this particular tender the recommendation to use the H200 machines only as front end communication devices would have made sense. Initially the H200 was intended to be used as either a front end peripheral controller in a large system or the solitary processor in a very small system, but the design was basically extremely modular with as much of the peripheral control as possible outside of the CPU, so replacing the CPU at a later stage wasn't a big deal. The tender quotes for type 201 CPUs, which were the earliest and simplest, so it would appear that the subsequent 201-1 and 201-2 CPUs, and also the 1201 and 2201 models, were not available yet, hence the mention of a possible revision of the recommendation later.

The tiny H200 punched card installation at our site, shown in a photo on my website, had a type 201 CPU, which was easily adequate for the purpose intended. We used this system for about four years as a direct replacement for an electromechanical tabulator, but in fact in that time we developed many new business facilities that the tabulator had never provided. I even managed to write software to compute the optimum contribution level for a complete corporate pension fund, one of our financial products, using just 4k bytes of memory. Our remarkable success with the H200 convinced the company's directors to invest in a much larger H1200 mag tape system and after that we just kept expanding. That was really the threat that concerned IBM, that the H200 could enable Honeywell to put their foot in the door and never leave a client site.

Even with that tiny system illustrated on my website Honeywell provided us with both a resident software developer / computer operator, who is actually in the photo, and also a resident field engineer. In fact the field engineer stayed with us for many years and used our office as a base for visiting other sites in the area. Therefore the claims made about support in the DuPont tender were well founded to my mind. On my website I emphasise that the H200 experience was about the complete service provided, not just the machine itself, so the project is a tribute to all the people involved as well as the hardware, documentation and training aids. It was a smart looking machine as well, so they never missed a trick.
 
This particular posting is veering off topic, but I think you'll want to read about it.

Earlier I mentioned that someone else had registered the domain name honeypi.co.uk. I have now been in correspondence with him and the explanation is quite weird. He is actually a bee-keeper and was planning to build a device for continuously logging the temperature and humidity within his hives using a Raspberry Pi computer, hence his domain name. That would be understandable except for the fact that we both personally have the same name and knew nothing about each other's domains! The fact that this other Rob S. used to operate an ICL 2966 is just the icing on the top. (The 2966 appears to have been a disk drive, so I need to ask him to clarify what he meant.) The link to the website for the holiday cottage that I mentioned previously was accidental. This is clearly a reminder that if anything important happens we shouldn't just post it on a website but also tell it to the bees.
 
Last edited:
I have had a liking for the Honeywell 200 ever since I saw Billion Dollar Brain years ago, anyhow on the BBC iPlayer right now on the BBC Parliament Channel you can see a program called "Sixty years of swing", around 9 minutes in there is a part from election night 1966, where Cliff Michelmore (memba him?) is describing the operation of the H200 they were using in the studio to crunch the numbers. great to see it operating - the past comes to life :)
 
Thanks for that. I'll try to get a copy of that clip from the programme.

I haven't worked on the project for a year now but another former Honeywell field engineer has contacted me just recently about his stash of stuff and most importantly he still has an engineer's reference manual which contains the instructions for adjusting the memory unit settings and he has sent me a copy of those pages. I would get back to work on the unit but my tiny workroom is now gridlocked with junk, so I am currently planning to install shelves in the loft to take the overflow. That done I'll have a bit of space to continue work.

There's still no confirmation from my contact in California about the existence of an original control panel as depicted in that TV clip, but he has also been doing other things, mostly earning a living. Ah, those were the days, when people paid me money for staying busy all day. It's a long time since that's happened -- getting paid for it I mean.

I have recently applied to invest in a local solar energy farm a few miles from here. If successful the return on my investment will pay for not only the extravagent quantity of electricity consumed by this power-hungry beast but also for other incidentals, like shipping stuff a third of the way around the world from California if I'm lucky. As I will effectively be consuming the electricity from the national grid generated by my own investment in solar panels I will be able to claim that my project is carbon-neutral, at least for the next five years.
 
Hello. I think the project to re-create an H200 is fantastic. I worked on an H125 in the H200 series at Courtaulds in Manchester for 5 years (late 1967 to early 1973) before going up the ladder. I loved that H125, which was the start of a 40 year career in computing.
A pal is currently on holiday in the usa and is willing to bring back that H200 console as luggage to save shipping costs. Any sign of it being available?
 
Hi Kev,
Yes, the control panel has now been spotted in my contact's parent's shed, so it definitely exists. He lives on the outskirts of Los Angeles but I don't know where his parents live. If you can give me an idea where your friend is and for how long then I could contact my chap about this offer to see whether there could be an opportunity. Regardless of the outcome thanks for the offer.

I think the H120 and H125 may have been the models that used early integrated circuits in place of transistors as the central processor cabinets looked smaller, holding only three racks instead of four like the H200. If this is so then my machine will be more like these models as I have those early ICs in large numbers. The memory unit is made from genuine H200 circuit boards though. If you have anything at all from your time working on the H125 then it may be of interest to me. I don't even have any printouts from my days working on the H200.

I haven't done any work on the project for almost two years now, but I am just preparing to start again. I turned the power supplies on a couple of days ago and was rewarded with the smell of dust burning on the hot components. My temporary bench power supplies don't provide enough current to operate the complete memory system, so I am considering adding booster batteries to them. The batteries will provide the extra current during test runs and then recharge from the power supplies between times. There's no point in my getting the components for a proper 1960's style mains transformer driven PSU until I know what the full load will be and the dimensions of the enclosure, so for now I'm using makeshift testbench PSUs. Nevertheless even these only use 1960's technology. With all the power being consumed I also need to add cooling fans to the memory. Once I've installed all the inhibit drivers the power consumption will rise about another 200 Watts.

The inhibit windings in the memory prevent a "1" being written to selected bits to form the required byte. To achieve this each inhibit winding passes through every core in an entire plane. Therefore in my 8k memory it goes through 8192 cores, which create a substantial amount of inductance. To overcome this inductance and form a correct pulse waveshape the drivers switch a relatively high voltage through series resistors to create an approximately constant current. The result is that to write all zero bytes to the memory about 200 Watts is burned off in those resistors. When I designed the backplane layout I took the precaution of positioning the inhibit drivers at the top so that the heat wouldn't affect any other components. However, H200 backplanes swivelled out of the cabinet for testing instead of sliding, so the memory unit is currently mounted on its side during construction and testing and my layout for normal operation isn't so effective. I need to place cooling fans directly adjacent to the inhibit drivers to draw air across them sideways. I have also bought an infrared thermometer to check for hot components when the unit is running. Spare parts are a distinct problem obviously, so I'd rather not abuse the parts that currently work.

I was wondering about the precise procedure for adjusting the memory to get it working properly as there are numerous variable elements provided in it to compensate for the variations in core memory manufacture at that time. Fortunately a former Honeywell engineer has contacted me and he still has a copy of the H200 engineer's reference book, which contains the memory adjustment procedures. I now have a copy of these from him, so that's another space in the jigsaw puzzle filled.

Building this machine is just a pastime for me when I have the time, so I am not hurrying to get the work done. The important thing is that I am collecting together in one place all the things needed to do it. The stuff that I have is all at least 45 years old, so a few more years won't affect it much.
 
Back
Top