CP/M User
Veteran Member
Re: daList
Re: daList
"barryp" wrote in message:
>>> I don't see the TI CC-40 on the list either.
>> Or the TI-99/4. It's simular (in appearance)
>> to the TI-99/4A listed there, but it isn't a
>> 16bit computer.
> No, the TI-99/4 (without the A) certainly is a
> 16-bit computer, both use a TMS9900NL.
> There's some software that won't run on one
> or the other but that's ~1%. the /4 and /4A
> should be lumped together for general
> purposes.
Oh okay, someone or something gave me the
impression that it was an 8bitter!
I was just wonderning if the /4 came out in
1979? And the /4A in 1981?
Cheers.
Re: daList
"barryp" wrote in message:
>>> I don't see the TI CC-40 on the list either.
>> Or the TI-99/4. It's simular (in appearance)
>> to the TI-99/4A listed there, but it isn't a
>> 16bit computer.
> No, the TI-99/4 (without the A) certainly is a
> 16-bit computer, both use a TMS9900NL.
> There's some software that won't run on one
> or the other but that's ~1%. the /4 and /4A
> should be lumped together for general
> purposes.
Oh okay, someone or something gave me the
impression that it was an 8bitter!
I was just wonderning if the /4 came out in
1979? And the /4A in 1981?
Cheers.