Corey986
Administrator
Funny I have a lot of 1981 computer mags and they all seem to have ads for Apple II+ clones and stuff.... I guess it depends on what we read back then....
Cheers,
Corey
Cheers,
Corey
Did you just relegate the Commodore computers to toys? Little play things and not a real computer? Oh man, good thing I'm an Apple II fan...
The simple definition of "mass market" is "the market for goods that are produced in large quantities". The "market" for computers is not the entire public. When Apple setup the Apple II assembly lines, it was to mass produce a product for a rapidly emerging market.No personal computer was "mass market" in 1977.
...
It is a fact that that first "mass market" computer, sold at mass merchandise retailers, was the VIC-20.
Business success is based on profits not sales. And having a profitable product with sustained sales (and profit) for 16 years, IMHO, is a great success. I encourage you to read up on Apple's mid-'80s history. The Apple II was keeping the company afloat while millions were being spent on R&D. Profits, not sales.but the Commodore 64 is the world's best-selling computer of all time, so if you define "success" as sales, your statement is incorrect (even with the clones thrown in).
Look, don't take this the wrong way, but you walked into an antique car show and said, "Hi, no idea what a car is - which one is the best? I want to collect it." Now the other collectors are arguing amongst themselves. This should not surprise you.
Which ones, Byte?
I'm with ya. I'm just amused at how the thread got completely hijacked. Not that there was any hope for it in the first place, but still. ;-)I'm not arguing over what computer is best (haven't done that since middle school) but to state the Apple II wasn't a sales leader in the home consumer market is just wrong.
Business success is based on profits not sales. And having a profitable product with sustained sales (and profit) for 16 years, IMHO, is a great success. I encourage you to read up on Apple's mid-'80s history. The Apple II was keeping the company afloat while millions were being spent on R&D. Profits, not sales.
Here is a good article about the International Consumer Electronics Show that I used in class instructions to make a few points about the changes that were happening in the computer market in the early 80's, before the IBM PC.
http://vintagecomputer.net/CISC367/...national Winter Consumer Electronics Show.pdf
Basically a normal keyboard like you find on an average PC, as opposed to a flat membrane keyboard (like microwave oven buttons), a "chiclet" keyboard (like a MacBook), or a "dead flesh" keyboard (like a calculator with rubber keys).what's a Full stroke keyboard?
That and the IIe outlived the Iic.
I have emailed the author for the source of his data without success (or reply). No data, no foundation to stand on. BTW, I am not disputing his numbers, I just want to see the source. And without a clear understanding of the impact of Apple II clones we will never know market share of the Apple II platform. IIRC, the TRS was also cloned, but AFAIK the Commodores were never cloned. The low price and custom chips didn't invite cloners. The relative high price and openness of the Altair, Apple, and IBM PC invited a lot of competition from clones.
The IIe was the mainstay of schools. They preferred it because the system unit served as its own monitor stand (while the IIc required a separate monitor stand) and could easily be chained down to the table to prevent theft. The IIc was too small and easy for someone to sneak into their backpack and walk away with.
Also if a IIe's external disk drive failed it could be easily swapped out, while the IIc's drive was built-in, so a failure required sending in the whole computer for service. The internal components of the IIe (motherboard, cards, power supply) could also be easily swapped out if the school had spare parts on-hand.
Apple was profitable because of all their lucrative sales and service contracts with schools.
Again you are glorifying Apple a little too much. Yes, the Apple II series was long-lived, but the Commodore 64 is the world's best-selling computer of all time, so if you define "success" as sales, your statement is incorrect (even with the clones thrown in).
World being a key word there. Commodore and Atari machines, particularly the post 8bit ones were much more popular in Europe then in the USA. Growing up, just about everyone I knew owned an Apple II series machine. Very few owned a C64 and nobody really owned an Amiga or Atari ST (a few had a IIgs). I didn't even know the VIC20 existed until many years later.
Income is a factor too. Many around here could afford an Apple II setup to have the same machine their child's school used. They also later went on to purchase a Macintosh or PC compatible once the 8bit machines were deemed obsolete. This is in contrast to Europe where many purchased the lower cost Amiga and Atari ST machines to replace their C64 or as their first computer.
Timex-Sinclair 1000 $99.95
Commodore VIC-20 $199.95
Atari 400 $299
TRS-80 Color Computer $399
TI-99/4A $450
Commodore 64 $595
PMC-80/81 $595
TRS-80 Model III $699
Toshiba T100 $795
Atari 800 $899
Cromemco C-10 $995
NEC PC-8001A $1205
IBM Personal Computer $1265
Commodore PET 4032 $1295
Apple II Plus $1330
Commodore CBM 8032 $1495
Franklin Ace 1000 $1595