CP/M User
Veteran Member
bbcmicro wrote:
Half right.
Oh well he's 'alf mad then! ;-)
Half right.
Oh well he's 'alf mad then! ;-)
But seriously though I'm not sure if it's possible here, though another forum I visit has the ability of withholding your number of posts from increasing depending on which section of the forum you post in, namely the chit-chat section on that forum (which most people post in strangely enough) doesn't increase your level of posts. Perhaps something similar could be done here for the General Off-Topic and Rants section?
maybe a viewer ranking might be better. If a viewer that a post was particularly helpful or relevant he could mark the post. Each member would get a mix of + , neutral and - post.
Funny you should mention the number of your posts in post #666. Is there something you're not telling us?I for example used to be (Don't know if I stillam) one of the members with the highest number of posts. Am I also one of the most knowledgeable members? I think not. I just asked lots of questions
Besides, if we do change the rank system based on posts/join date, Terry would go mad with power.
You cats are phunny.....
I guess Druid would be ElectroGenius...
Heh - wonder what "title" you're all gonna throw on ME
T
We have moderators, junior members, senior members, but only one Space Commander!
You folks are funny. . . but I'm with ya.
Post your list of proposed titles and associated post counts and I'll see what I can do. :D
I've been on forums where most of the posts were low quality and obviously from people who were trying to get their post counts up to unlock the next title. I'm glad this isn't one of those.id say 1500 to 2000 posts for senior member OR 6 to 8 years of membership. Does that sound fair?