eeguru
Veteran Member
Does anyone know why winworldpc.com went away? Legal challenge? Admin hardship? forgot to pay the bill? Or 'sucks to be you, dude. It's working for me'?
I wonder if that staff member controlled some aspect of the infrastructure (server, domain registration, etc) and they are fearful of retribution. /shrug.
If anyone has any HELPFUL ideas or discussion for recovering, I would love to hear them.
Let's concentrate on this aspect of the discussion. Off the top of my head, here are some options:
I have opinions on which is best, but I would prefer to hear from Duff, the winworld founder. (I don't have an account on the winworld forums and I don't even know if they are up.)
- Copy the DB/codebase and stand it back up. Pros: Everything, including presentation and organization, back to normal. Cons: Difficult to maintain, cost involved, would require "recruitment" of someone versed in PHP.
- Start standardzing on dumping everything to archive.org. Pros: Unmetered storage space. Cons: Lack of organization.
- Start up a new site/community using a commonly-available CMS that supports forums and taxonomy features (ie. Drupal). Pros: Easier for mortals to maintain. Cons: A lot of design and stand-up work; still needs maintenance from time to time.
- Set up an FTP site with much storage. Pros: Very fast to stand up and maintain; easy to set up and maintain distributed mirrors. Cons: Lack of nice presentation.
If a mod would care to step in, I would prefer if the "whys" are not discussed here.
The important thing is we are now down a main server, DB codebase, and server admin.
No possibility of a reconciliation or accommodation of some kind?
where am i going to get my old copies of windows now?
try betaarchives.
Do you still need to contribute a certain amount of new software to join?
Yes, I am/was the library director, the one who processed contributions and added files. Although I am a bit of a database guy, I am unfortunately not much of a server guy or web guy.SomeGuy, I assume by your response you are affiliated with the site. As I mentioned before, archive.org has been mirroring the generated end result of the content. Perhaps database reconstruction could be aided from their archived HTML in an automated way? (eg. parsing content from specific div names, etc?)