cjs
Veteran Member
Yes. My "new" ThinkPad was made in 2016. I'm still using ThinkPads made in 2010 for day to day work.And Microsoft, Google, (substitute any other manufacturer) is better?
I suppose it depends on what you feel is "reasonable." A year or two ago I upgraded my Nexus 6, which was not super-quick but still livable, to a Pixel 3XL. Neither was getting OS updates for security issues even at the time I bought them, which is worrisome. Yet the Pixel 3 seems fine otherwise, and with a battery replacement in a year or so, I would expect to be able to use it for several more years.Google and Samsung have the best Android update policies. They don't cover as long a duration as Apple does but still reasonable.
Yes, very much so. It had twice the memory and several times the performance of typical other computers at the time it was designed, and somehow managed also to be two or three times as slow to get anything done. But it sure looked pretty!As far as the first 3 macs wasnt that more of a system ram issue? I know they made 3rd party addon boards which could get the plus beyond 1mb. MAybe the 512 as well. I would think 1mb or 512k was really the issue there.
The issue there, for anything network-connected (which is pretty much everything these days), is security updates.Don’t update then if you don’t need the features? So the device will work until caps went dry.
Perhaps you were using the very same Apple IIs I used in junior high in Coquitlam back in the early '80s.Even when I was in grade 6 in 2001, the Apple II and LOGO was STILL optional components of the class lessons and by then it was already 8 years past EOL.
(or we had incredibly dated learning materials. BC was a different place 25 years ago)
You're just old. Nobody uses a phone for "talking on the phone" these days. (Except old people.)13 years ago, how many mobile phones had WiFi capabilities (don't forget the aspect of security protocols)? What's the purpose of a telephone, mobile or otherwise? If you can't make and receive calls, the phone is junk or a collector's item.
The answer to me is that the soldered in Dallas module saved a couple of bucks, and those that tried external batteries finally got sick of watching customers go to their competitors who were selling what looked like the same product but cheaper.Why did so many manufacturers give up on external batteries for the 386+ era motherboards, opting instead for a soldered-in Dallas module? Surely, they were aware of the life of the internal battery and that the retail cost of replacement would far exceed the value of the motherboard. The answer to me is that they didn't expect users to hang onto the things 7 years down the road.
And even for those customers who do want something longer lasting, simply doing that and charging more doesn't help much when products are changing so quickly. Sure, these guys selling the more expensive one say it will not go obsolete as quickly, but will it really? As a consumer I often have no easy way to evaluate those claims, so I'm better off just buying the cheaper one and replacing it when it dies.