CP/M User
Veteran Member
Hello,
Since I've been leaving clues all over this message board, everyone
probably knows who I 'am by now!
Oh well, If you don't read the regular newsgroups (or this) you may
not have!
I merely have an Amstrad CPC computer (also couple of DOS emulators
running for it on a IBM compatable), play around & program with CP/M
on that, also play around & do some programming in CP/M-86 on the IBMs.
Main programming language I use is Turbo Pascal. Although I like to play
with the low-level code it allows some support for. Since Turbo Pascal
was what I started working with on my ol' IBM XT, it's what I've
seemed to have learned best, as an added bonus it's available for the
Amstrad CPC (under CP/M) & CP/M-86. In programming (using Turbo
Pascal) I have only done a little porting between these systems. The
simplier the better (although I like to bring in some routines which are
highly unportable, but it's the best way of producing what those machines
are capable of!)
Regards.
Since I've been leaving clues all over this message board, everyone
probably knows who I 'am by now!
Oh well, If you don't read the regular newsgroups (or this) you may
not have!
I merely have an Amstrad CPC computer (also couple of DOS emulators
running for it on a IBM compatable), play around & program with CP/M
on that, also play around & do some programming in CP/M-86 on the IBMs.
Main programming language I use is Turbo Pascal. Although I like to play
with the low-level code it allows some support for. Since Turbo Pascal
was what I started working with on my ol' IBM XT, it's what I've
seemed to have learned best, as an added bonus it's available for the
Amstrad CPC (under CP/M) & CP/M-86. In programming (using Turbo
Pascal) I have only done a little porting between these systems. The
simplier the better (although I like to bring in some routines which are
highly unportable, but it's the best way of producing what those machines
are capable of!)
Regards.